CARTRIDGE
We all
know that the turntable, the arm and the cartridge interact in a
very delicate way. The diamond tip picks up the tiniest information.
The analogue source has far more bits than the digital formats!
The minute movements are transformed into electrical signals by
the coils in the cartridge and send to the amplifier.
Turntable-arm-cartridge should be seen as an entity. That is why
one commercial arm performs better than another in conjunction with
the same turntable (motor unit) and why a given cartridge does not
always deliver as pure a signal with certain arms and record players.
I designed this arm with a Denon DL 103 cartridge in mind and in
practice. The DL103 is a very fine cartridge not only if one takes
the price into account. There are many audiophiles and music lovers
who have been frustrated by the use of some expensive and fragile
cartridges that prevented them form relaxed listening because of
the constant worrying about the fragile cantilever, the expensive
thin shaped diamond tip and in some cases the collected dust in
an open cartridge. That is not to say that the high quality and
high end cartridges need to be a pain in the neck. They perform
extremely well if the owner takes care and has the right equipment
in order to display the virtues.
EFFECTIVE
MASS
A cartridge
performs best with a specific tone arm. Not only because of the
sonic qualities of the arm, but also because of the effective mass
of the arm. The effective mass should be perfectly suited to the
cartridge that you want to use. The first SME was built at the beginning
of the stereo era for the new Shure lightweight pick up. Fidelity
Research have built cartridges that had to be adopted by arms with
an effective mass as high as 30 gr. And they built the arms to go
with these cartridges. 
For the Denon DL 103 the English magazine Hi-Fi Choice states 16
gr. as the maximum effective mass of the arm. To those 16 gr. the
weight of the cartridge has to be added. That means that more than
the 16 gr. (without counting the weight of the cartridge) will put
the resonance too low. The sound will then have a lumpy quality
and impair speed. On the other hand too little mass will mis track
the groove and blur mid and high frequencies, and will give the
sound some vagueness at the same time because of the fact that the
fundamental frequencies of instruments are not well controlled and
thus not well transmitted. Just to remind you once again.
ADJUSTMENT
With
this DESIGN you can find out and adjust the effective mass of the
arm tube without the need of adding weight as is usually done by
means of a sliding metal ring or screwing some weight in between
the cartridge body and the head shell. At the same time you will
keep the arm as long as possible. My impression is that the 'unused'
part of the arm tube at the other end of the pivot has a significant
influence on the sonic properties notwithstanding the fact that
the tube will be secured above the pivot and the propagation of
sound waves will be stopped to a certain extend because of the tight
connection with the short tube with knife bearings.
For every 10 mm of the aluminum tube that I used I had to calculate
a weight of 0.6 gr. For the screws used to fit the cartridge and
the small acrylic mounting plate some 2 gr. should be added. The
result was that an effective mass of the arm of 16 gr. could be
calculated as follows: 16 - 2 = 14 : 0.6 = 23.3 cm.
N.B. A friend of mine told me that I had not calculated the effective
mass according to the appropriate equation. Therefor I will recalculate
it later and write in this section about it.
The total length of the arm tube used by me was 38 cm. I tried the
arm at 28 cm which gives a mass of 16.8 gr. without counting screws,
mounting plate (and of course the cartridge). At first hearing the
sound was well controlled but was lumpy and muddy. So I had to experiment
and detect a more suitable mass. (See at the end of this article.)
ARM LIFT,
CALIBRATION AND SPRING
As arm
lift you can use an existing arm lift or you can think up something
as I did. My lift works as a lift but is not suitable for positioning
the cartridge on the right spot.
For calibrating the arm (overhang, horizontal tracking angle) you
should use a template from a manufacturer, a shop or you make one
yourself. Be sure to firmly secure the arm at the base after alignment.
Also the arm tube should be secured very firmly so that a swinging
mode can not occur and an accentuation of some frequencies is impossible.
Now it is time to calibrate the vertical pressure. I use the arm
in its dynamic version. That is the version with the spring. That
spring has to be very supple but at the same time not too long.
A long spring has to be shortened when you have shifted the tube
to the back, that is when you have shortened the effective length
of the arm tube. You will notice that. If you do not do that the
spring and the ring n the arm tube are likely to touch the platter
and record.
When calibrating the tracking weight first of all the sliding ring
on the arm tube to which the spring is attached should be close
to the pivot so that the spring does have no influence and the weight
of the ring (little as it may be) has no significance either. Balance
the arm with the counterweight. Than move the ring in the direction
of the cartridge and the spring will get some tension. Use a tracking
weight balance of Nagaoka, Shure or any other make and move the
ring so far that the scale indicates 2.25 gr. for the Denon; if
you use another cartridge you will have changed for another effective
arm mass and you will have to use the proper tracking force indicated
by the manufacturer.
All moving parts that are not well secured and thus can vibrate
have an influence on the sound. In order to eliminate any resonance
provoked by the ring and the spring you should take a tiny bit of
balsa wood or a very small part of a match and push that in between
the arm and the ring so that the ring cannot move or vibrate. Originally
I had damped these resonance by means of tape. But when a collector
from abroad came to visit me and we listened to various records
we decided that the sound was too well damped and the mid band was
not open enough, which as I discovered later was caused by the small
pieces of black plastic insulation tape in combinations with the
mass of the arm which was too high. So finally I adjusted the arm
and reduced the effective length of the arm tube to 25 cm.
In time you will also discover that the tracking force needs adjustment
as well as the side thrust (bias).
DYNAMICALLY
VERSUS STATICALLY BALANCED
Applying
the maximum of mass for a given cartridge will especially be of
benefit to the reproduction of recordings from the nineteen fifties
en sixties, the era when tone arms were much more heavier. All of
a sudden I became aware of the fact that Samson François
must have been playing on a grand piano manufactured by Erard (or
Pleyel?) when recording the Four Ballads of Chopin (Columbia FC
1041, 10"). And it is amazing how good the piano tone was captured
in those days. Also you can notice that Jorge Bolet probably plays
a Baldwin on his Remington recordings.
Using a spring for the vertical down force has the advantage that
the pressure is practically always the same. There is just a slight
variation when warped records are played. As said earlier the variations
in pressure when using a statically balanced arm are much greater
because of the swinging of tube and counterweight, while with a
spring this movement is suppressed, (better controlled).

If you use a gimbal bearing as in the Thorens arms in combination
with the spring, the arm will play records in whatever position
the turntable is in. Nevertheless you should however always adjust
the turntable so it is level.
POSITION
OF TIP AND COUNTERWEIGHT
In
the proposed design you will see that the pivot is at the same horizontal
level as the diamond tip. On top of that the counterweight is positioned
underneath that horizontal plane. So this arm can also be used as
a statically balanced arm and will perform well.
I de-coupled the counterweight by means of a few centimeters of
rubber insulation (shaft) taken from an old, yet supple interconnect.
I put this insulation over the bolt which holds the counterweight.
The amount of play between counterweight and bolt depends on the
tightness of the insulation and the sort of rubber or plastic.
SOUND
The
performance of a tone arm depends also on the sonic virtues of the
turntable itself and if they match the arm's behavior. The sort
of turntable mat is of great significance. If you use an acrylic
mat (à la Goldmund) on a rather heavy platter you need high
quality amplifiers that perform extremely well in the top end of
the audio band. If you use a rubber mat distortion will be increased.
If you use a turntable mat of glass the top and bottom ends of the
audio band will be much cleaner but also "lighter" in nature.
I must say that I am very pleased with this arm. The sound has weight
and transparency, nevertheless the audio curve appears very even
and straight. Transient response is very good. The soul of the music
is conveyed in a very realistic way.
UPDATE
My
aim was to have a long tone arm in order to minimize the horizontal
tracking angle. But also I wanted a long tube as would be possible
for reasons of sound. At the same time I wanted to have the possibility
to find the optimum effective mass for a specific cartridge without
adding weight in the form of blocks or little plates between the
cartridge and the head shell (mounting plate).
This article is meant as an inspiration to those who want to try
building a tone arm themselves; not necessarily in the same way
and with the same parts as I did.
It is possible to use lighter aluminum tube but it has to have enough
rigidity to avoid bending (it easily does even if you do not see
it).
Eventually I will try to improve my arm by finding and using a higher
grade of tube which is used in medical equipment for example or
I will try to get hold of a carbon fiber tube; even though I am
a fan of aluminum more so than of carbon fiber.
If you have questions and/or comments send an e-mail.
Comments and suggestions from readers will be included in these
pages.
So this article is to be continued.
© December
1998 R.A.B.
UPDATE 2
Since
1998 the turntable has not altered and the arm and cartridge are
still functioning extremely well and give with - the Denon DL-103
- a very harmonious build up, an open stage, depth and tangible
sound. The only upgrade I have made is exchanging the arm wires
for Cardas phono wire (Cardas 4x33 AWG Shielded Tone Arm Cable)
and the many (10 !) interconnects in my active system are all terminated
with Bullet Plugs and the connecting cables are are all Cardas Crosslink
ordered at http://www.diycable.com. The only exception is the interconnect
of the electronically and mechanically!!! modified
Denon DCD 2560 CD-Player, which is connected via a Cardas Cross
Link.
31-12-2003